Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:37:44 -0400 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: mdf@freebsd.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Include file search path Message-ID: <BANLkTin6oG3HFTEw8VqyxS8FKBNDjwwz1A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D6743558-51E0-46AE-926C-C692904AA02A@bsdimp.com> References: <AANLkTi=BiUVnzsGg83wwWPHjnTDR=XukhJ3UK6Bd5hvF@mail.gmail.com> <4D934AF4.9080503@FreeBSD.org> <BB9CDEF6-5B59-47F3-8873-78D71E39BF3E@bsdimp.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1104021925110.67810@fledge.watson.org> <742085CD-7F6F-4879-9FFD-517EC3203D52@bsdimp.com> <F5CE9765-FFF0-439C-9156-51912EEE0C1C@freebsd.org> <5AF348C8-6AB6-490D-A12E-89A51528F58F@bsdimp.com> <BANLkTikec9iYVtLMnJ2ovZvENhrFmt_V-g@mail.gmail.com> <D6743558-51E0-46AE-926C-C692904AA02A@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> Hi Warner, >> >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >>> >>>> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote: >>>> >>>>>> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. This seems like a basic >>>>>> requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not yet a >>>>>> resolved issue? >>>>> >>>>> 0 work has been done here to my knowledge. The world view for clang and our in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge. >>>> >>>> That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM? >>> >>> Yes. The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a little different. >>> >>>>>> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core 64-bit MIPS platform. We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot loader work, and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year. The base system seems a bit short on detail when it comes to the above, currently. >>>>> >>>>> Yes. I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to building with xdev compilers. A similar number are needed to make it easy to configure and add systree support, I think. >>>> >>>> Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just works" state with regard to this? >>> >>> I sure hope so. I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan. >>> >> BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussion ? > > It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree. Needs about 4 hours of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work getting busier than I expected. > any chances to have a look at the patch or should I wait for the final commit ? Thanks, - Arnaud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTin6oG3HFTEw8VqyxS8FKBNDjwwz1A>