Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:06:25 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: david@catwhisker.org, taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp Cc: mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reality check on ESS Technology Maestro-2E h/w "mute" function? Message-ID: <200103271706.f2RH6Pq15569@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <rtg1yrjvebk.wl@dhcp-1.cent.saitama-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:52:31 +0900 >From: Taku YAMAMOTO <taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp> >But, since mute button is actually choded into UP-and-DOWN simultaneously, >it may happen to misunderstand MUTE button as if an independent >UP/DOWN event came first. (It is nothing more than my imagination, though.) >So, perhaps 0x77 came from HWVOL_DOWN | 0x11, I imagine. >Attached diff will make both 0x77 and 0x99 to be recognized as MUTE. >(And, hopefully, 0xbb --- HWVOL_UP | 0x11 --- , too) OK; the patch appears to work in today's -CURRENT (as expected), too. I hadn't known about the intended behavior of pressing the UP/DOWN buttons (on the left side of the keyboard) simultaneously; when I try it with the patch (in -CURRENT), it does drop the volume to 0. However, unlike the Fn+End chord, the UP+DOWN chord does not toggle the volume back to "normal" -- it merely drops it to 0. In any case, I find it a vast improvement. I'm willing to file a PR, if that would help get the code committed.... Thanks again, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103271706.f2RH6Pq15569>