Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:48:03 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <20120620174803.GE23095@hemlock.hydra> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416120.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CA%2BtpaK0XUEBpT7SiwsY=%2BwEPgOd=TAh=Eh7fwim1Odq1jUqZag@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200854450.71564@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK0S=tsYfUhuL6BsUPu7u%2BtB47gMGGTp6Abevh0_1CaayA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201024140.40030@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CAH3a3KWy9Qzf5BOUGWM3TLZe5XV3gKz0WhWQJ1q8j9F3FV7hYg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201054480.23394@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE19BFC.7030304@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201212150.23787@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE1BDEC.1040705@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416120.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:16:43PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >speed estimates. > > there are a difference between speed estimate and actual speed - and > i talk about the latter only. You're talking about poorly managed benchmarks that are imprecise and prone to fluctuation, applying only to very specific cases that are not necessarily very broadly representative, but you are talking about them as though they are perfectly representative of all cases. That is, at best, "speed estimates". > > > >Besides, NetBSD and OpenBSD has already selected and using pcc > >now. And they are fine with that one. > > their problem. No -- it's their solution. It would be a problem only if the previous statement said "and they are *not* fine with that one." -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120620174803.GE23095>