Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 10:41:23 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905131038000.509-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <199905120926.SAA19601@srapc342.sra.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Noriyuki Soda wrote: > > > BTW, there are many fundamental design flaws in new-bus, so I don't > > > think new-bus is comparable with newconfig, yet, even if priority > > > probe is implemented. For example: > > > > I'm not going to reply to these points as I suspect it will lead to a > > pointless flame thread. I would prefer to discuss these issues in person > > at Usenix. > > I agree that this is better way to solve the conflicts between new-bus > and newconfig. Although I wondered why FreeBSD's core decide to choose > new-bus before Usenix. As I suspected, a massive flamewar has happened while I've been away. I don't think I have anything to add to what has been said (and I certainly don't want to continue a flamewar). Can people please just drop the subject until after Usenix. This kind of flamewar is too upsetting (to me anyway) and just makes it harder to have a useful face-to-face discussion. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905131038000.509-100000>