Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:08:29 -0700 From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> To: tak.official@gmail.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Throughput test with iperf... Message-ID: <04980532-FA66-4660-B1E0-0E4AF59025A5@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <CAPkyVLwqZJjbjRkHVPmR9NRF_gvp5dZVO1%2B2MWPL%2BZNnt%2Be57g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPkyVLyf3Eds5MMAEk%2ByoE11CAh5Yet4yJMMM3ru4TMsZqtesg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkyVLwqZJjbjRkHVPmR9NRF_gvp5dZVO1%2B2MWPL%2BZNnt%2Be57g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 September 2013, at 23:38, takCoder <tak.official@gmail.com> wrote: > hi again.. >=20 > would any of you please at least explain it to me what may cause iperf > server ending up with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" message right = at > the beginning of setting second connection in my bi-directional = throughput > test, using -r flag?? >=20 > i used these commands on client and server on two freebsd machines = which > are connected straight with one cat5e cable: >=20 > iperf -s -i 1 > iperf -c X.Y.Z.T -t 60 -r >=20 > just getting more confused.. :( Are you using iperf or iperf2. Iperf has a few problems. Iperf2 is = more stable.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?04980532-FA66-4660-B1E0-0E4AF59025A5>