Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:34:12 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS Message-ID: <20060829113148.V48261@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> In-Reply-To: <20060829101749.R48261@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> <44F3429F.6050204@FreeBSD.org> <44F344FA.1000408@elischer.org> <20060828221218.GB93062@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> <44F370F2.7080406@elischer.org> <20060829010553.GC93062@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> <20060829101749.R48261@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >> a process to a network interface alias on the fly? So if you had ten >> possible > > Alas I don't see the way to bind an abstract process to the specific IP > address on hosts with several IPs. For applications which use connect(2), ...short of using jails, of course (but it isn't always an option due to their overhead and limitations). Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060829113148.V48261>