Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:53:40 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, office@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libreoffice fails to build Message-ID: <CAN6yY1sPkuPTt0BtWNoavA-o2FRbEPjwRL88bzR_pC5qyNJenw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-0gak%2B8kBpmg6jUdeHcrYC65CEqCg1SciFe5TXiceM6g@mail.gmail.com> References: <20486.55903.34769.952614@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <500729B3.1050208@FreeBSD.org> <20487.20506.88401.623249@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <CADLo83-0gak%2B8kBpmg6jUdeHcrYC65CEqCg1SciFe5TXiceM6g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 Jul 2012 01:09, "Robert Huff" <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: >> >> >> Doug Barton writes: >> >> > > On a system running: >> > > >> > > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64 >> > > >> > > and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5 >> > >> > Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you sure your >> > world is current enough to get the latest clang fixes? >> >> System and ports were updated (by csup) at 00:01 US Eastern >> time today. >> Recent enough? > > I don't wish to patronise, but you did also make world too, right? "clang (3.1)". I think the CLANG in stable as of yesterday is 3.2. So, no, I don't think you are patronizing. I do wish a note had been made in ports/UPDATING that 3.5.5 requires either the latest clang port or a world built yesterday. Actually, the commit to stable was almost exactly two days ago, but with mirror propagation and time zones, I think "yesterday" is the right answer. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1sPkuPTt0BtWNoavA-o2FRbEPjwRL88bzR_pC5qyNJenw>