Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 12:15:10 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: rcarter@consys.com (Russell L. Carter), pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co, fenyo@email.enst.fr, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD Message-ID: <199705151815.MAA01989@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199705151725.KAA15126@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199705151553.IAA22312@conceptual.com> <199705151725.KAA15126@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > The difference between "could" and "does" is the > > reason for the failure of (nearly) every business unit that sold > > highly parallel/cluster systems. > > Except Goodyear. And Thinking Machines Corp. And Cray Computing. > And Cray Research. And Fujitsu. And... Hmm, how many of these are still in business selling highly parallel systems? Sounds like failure to me... Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705151815.MAA01989>