Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:51:33 -0500 (EST) From: chris@netmonger.net To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: bin/16885: chflags/setflags lost several flags Message-ID: <200002211851.NAA01357@lion-around.at.yiff.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 16885
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: chflags/setflags lost several flags
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 21 11:00:01 PST 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Christopher Masto
>Release: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #4: Sat Feb 19 19:26:06 EST 2000
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/setflags.c:
$FreeBSD: src/lib/libc/gen/setflags.c,v 1.14 2000/01/27 21:16:53 joe Exp $
>Description:
Revision 1.12 of lib/libc/gen/setflags.c, despite the innocuous log
message "Rewriting of flags_to_string() and string_to_flags() to use
an array", deleted several flags: SF_NOUNLINK UF_NOUNLINK, and
UF_OPAQUE.
chflags(1) and chflags(2) still claim that these flags exist.
>How-To-Repeat:
chris@lion-around:/tmp$ touch foo; chflags uunlnk foo
chflags: invalid flag: uunlnk
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002211851.NAA01357>