Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 May 2005 19:56:49 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To:        Sten Spans <sten@blinkenlights.nl>
Cc:        jmg@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: if_tap unaligned access problem
Message-ID:  <20050502194640.Q3199@odysseus.silby.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0505030116500.709@tea.blinkenlights.nl>
References:  <20050428135120.GB21428@cell.sick.ru> <427111BF.2050607@savvis.net><20050502180353.T787@odysseus.silby.com> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0505030116500.709@tea.blinkenlights.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sten Spans wrote:

> For the if_tap case fixing the driver ( or rather changing m_uiotombuf )
> is definately the correct solution. No sensible person would say otherwise.
> Once the if_tap change is properly tested and signed off it should
> make it into the tree.

Yes, that makes sense.

> But on the proposed alignment changes:
>
> If you would look at the netbsd url (
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2002/07/01/0001.html )

As I said above, just leave the IP stack alone and put the (conditional on 
non-i386) code around line 731 of if_ethersubr.c:

         /* If the CRC is still on the packet, trim it off. */
         if (m->m_flags & M_HASFCS) {
                 m_adj(m, -ETHER_CRC_LEN);
                 m->m_flags &= ~M_HASFCS;
         }
<-- here
         switch (ether_type) {
#ifdef INET
         case ETHERTYPE_IP:

Then you cover all the protocols at once.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050502194640.Q3199>