Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:53:39 -0700 From: Bakul Shah <bakul@iitbombay.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>, Minsoo Choo <minsoochoo0122@proton.me>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Future of jemalloc on FreeBSD after archive Message-ID: <A10B5B6A-6A37-49DC-91E7-F2A3A2A2E117@iitbombay.org> In-Reply-To: <aEhcWRoElLF3reLy@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <sLUPmdWvgjaNJL3ly0NC29emSncHWcPnwkuqJ_v_T2_OsBK9BtdJcm17AeGD-2VBZp7gLEpMis-PiJG7zOueEcBhfVIlIpSVNKWfEgmKFn4=@proton.me> <CALH631kPtnUPKztDt2w1vbXU7mpf64L7=bVzYZM6YVk2Utg2nQ@mail.gmail.com> <19F76966-2365-4598-9E9F-FC37133D980B@iitbombay.org> <aEhcWRoElLF3reLy@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Jun 10, 2025, at 9:24 AM, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 09:02:37AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: >> On Jun 10, 2025, at 8:40???AM, Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 11:08???PM Minsoo Choo <minsoochoo0122@proton.me> wrote: >>>> >>>> As of June 2, 2025, jemalloc repository on Github has been archived. [1] >>> >>> Is there any explanation why it got archived? It feels surprising as I >>> recently heard news that Qt added some code to take advantage of >>> jemalloc-specific functions. >> >> From https://x.com/nateberkopec/status/1930010446410723533 & followups: >> >> jemalloc mystery resolved: jemalloc has moved to the official Facebook github organization >> >> context: for the last 2+ years the primary maintainers of jemalloc have been FB employees. this just formalizes Evans' stepping off the project. >> >> jemalloc???s not dead ! The Meta fork is the new home, ???still actively developing here??? but issues now have to go in discussions https://github.com/facebook/jemalloc/discussions/7#discussioncomment-13394532 >> >> Contributor commit info shows pretty abrupt handoff from Jason Evans to Qi Wang (interwq) and David Goldblatt in 2017, so I presume this ???small team??? was primarily these 2. Note Qi Wang???s contributions tapering off, David stopped post-pandemic: LinkedIn says he left Meta in 2024 > > It's been maintained by Facebook forever so that's not a change. The change is it becomes the primary repo. > Why not move the repo or break the fork so issues work? This feels like > flailing around without understanding how github works and does not > inspire confidence. My guess is, the "move" might not be possible if they already had a fork. AIUI, issues don't get transferred to a fork. But no idea really why they did what they did. I was just answering Gleb's question!help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A10B5B6A-6A37-49DC-91E7-F2A3A2A2E117>
