Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 01:29:23 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com> To: Andrew Riabtsev <resident@b-o.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netgraph questions on ng_tee, ng_iface, ng_socket Message-ID: <20040120012819.I312-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> In-Reply-To: <14414573064.20040119152825@b-o.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Andrew Riabtsev wrote: > DN> connecting the ng_iface hook inet to ng_ether's upper or lower doesnt make > DN> any sense because ng_ether itself does not do an encasulation of the IP > DN> packet into an ethernet frame. or am i wrong here, and just configuring it > DN> wrongly ? > > Connecting ng_iface:inet and ng_ether:upper/lower do nothing, well, it > do something but not what you are waiting for, i think. i know, hence was asking if there was something i could do, even if it meant writing an extension to ng_ether to create a new netgraph type. Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040120012819.I312-100000>