Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:13:26 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org, virtualization@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11} update to 10.1.0
Message-ID: <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org>
References: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!
> I'd like anyone possible to test an updated version of
> emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11}. I have the patch here for those who
> wish to build themselves:
>
> https://people.freebsd.org/~swills/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools-10.1.0.diff
I tried to built it on
12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r307013:311651M
(why does it say r307013:311651M, btw?)
and it failed to build with:
utilBacktrace.c:155:20: error: implicit declaration of function '_Unwind_GetCFA'
is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
uintptr_t cfa = _Unwind_GetCFA(ctx);
^
utilBacktrace.c:357:4: error: implicit declaration of function
'_Unwind_Backtrace' is invalid in C99
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
_Unwind_Backtrace(UtilBacktraceFromPointerCallback, &data);
^
utilBacktrace.c:357:4: note: did you mean 'Util_Backtrace'?
Any ideas ?
--
pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170121141326.GK13006>