Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:48:11 -0600 From: "matt bedynek" <mbedynek@insync.net> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Linux Support Message-ID: <000801c0904b$d4297e90$512210d1@hlp.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] >If for some reason you do not want to or cannot load the KLD, then you may statically link the binary >compatibility in the kernel by adding options LINUX to your kernel configuration file. Then install your >new kernel as described in the kernel configuration section of this handbook. Is there any advantage to running statically linked linux support? Speed? Matt [-- Attachment #2 --] <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> <P>>If for some reason you do not want to or cannot load the KLD, then you may statically link the binary </P> <P>>compatibility in the kernel by adding <TT class=LITERAL>options LINUX</TT> to your kernel configuration file. Then install your </P> <P>>new kernel as described in the <A href="http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/kernelconfig.html">kernel configuration</A> section of this handbook.</P> <P>Is there any advantage to running statically linked linux support?</P> <P>Speed?</P> <P>Matt</P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000801c0904b$d4297e90$512210d1>