Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 14:49:41 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Marco Masotti <masotti@mclink.it> Cc: Paul Dekkers <P.Dekkers@cgu.nl>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NAT vs. MASQUERADING (e.g. FBSD vs. Linux) Message-ID: <199810131349.OAA10834@woof.lan.awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Oct 1998 08:20:04 -0000." <3621BBB4.284797A9@mclink.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Paul Dekkers wrote:
>
> >I've tested once nat with just loopback and it seemed a lot slower
>
> I agree, still a few months ago the NAT ppp was slow and buggy,
> especially with some applications, one for all is Quake.
?
What do you mean by buggy ? Are you talking about libalias ? I
don't recall any bug reports....
> Slowness with Quake is an hard experience, you know :-)
>
> Don't know with linux masquerading though.
>
> -Marco
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>, <brian@FreeBSD.org>, <brian@OpenBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>;
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810131349.OAA10834>