Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:02:52 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl Cc: des@des.no Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/sound/pcm mixer.c Message-ID: <20040621.160252.93156812.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20040621202301.GA55277@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <xzpu0x5tkdt.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040621201152.GA594@jenny.daemon.li> <20040621202301.GA55277@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20040621202301.GA55277@freebie.xs4all.nl>
Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> writes:
: On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:11:52PM +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
: > > "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: > > > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
: > > > > that should be pcm.0.line, for consistency.
: > > > hw.pcm.0.line, don't you mean?
: > > =
: > > Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of hint.pcm.0.line.=
..
: > =
: > any final consensus how the lines should look like?
: =
: bikeshed.pcm.0.line ?
: =
: :)
This isn't a bikeshed. It is a consistancy argument. I really wish
people would stop shouting 'bikeshed' at the drop of a hat.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040621.160252.93156812.imp>