Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:23:59 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Matt Simerson <freebsd@blockads.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Ellard <ellard@eecs.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS server benchmarks vs. OpenBSD, NetBSD? Message-ID: <20020623052359.GJ53232@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20020622192803.B20405@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <3D129A60.99AA2608@mindspring.com> <E2B9BDC5-851E-11D6-963B-00306553B5E4@blockads.com> <20020622192803.B20405@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> [020622 19:28] wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 09:57:55AM -0400, Matt Simerson wrote: > > FreeBSD has very solid NFS code in addition to being a very robust, > > versatile, and downright fun operating system. It's very easy to do > > everything I want to with FreeBSD. It's NFS is missing locking support > > but it's very fast and works very well with FreeBSD and Mac OS X > > clients. I haven't used it with anything else. Actually FreeBSD 5.x should have lockd support. I should know, I ported it from BSD/os. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020623052359.GJ53232>