Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 09:03:15 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Warren Welch <wwlists@intraceptives.com.au>, Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>, Ugen Antsilevitch <ugen@xonix.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI modems do not work??? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909070901160.14497-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <19990907100735.8E89B1CA9@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > Well, it seems Bruce objects to this.. I don't know why though. If > he's concerned about loosing the tightly integrated sio<->isa stuff > then I guess there could be an "osio" (old sio) or "isasio" or > something driver that remains isa-specific. I could well imagine this > could be important for older/slower machines. Is he on the same page as the rest of us here? We're just talking about the probe/attach bits, and anywhere else that makes use of isa_get_foo() calls that could be handled via more abstract methods right? I don't get this non-maintainence maintainer role here. - Confused in Maryland. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909070901160.14497-100000>