Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:24:09 +0300 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, scottl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch Message-ID: <4A71D739.6040308@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200907301706.n6UH6HrY047414@lava.sentex.ca> References: <4A4517BE.9040504@FreeBSD.org> <200907301706.n6UH6HrY047414@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa wrote: > Tried with postmark and bonnie. Bonnie (no surprise) doesnt show any > differences, but postmark shows some > > In AHCI mode > Time: > 22 seconds total > 22 seconds of transactions (681 per second) > > and in stock kernel ATA mode > Time: > 38 seconds total > 37 seconds of transactions (405 per second) "Some", you said? :) It's really cool! Have you checked it twice? > One small bug I noticed is that if I accidentally give camcontrol a > bogus value, the disk subsystem seems to lock up > #camcontrol inquiry 0:0 > > On the console, its saying > ahcich0: Timeout on slot 23 > ahcich0: Timeout on slot 2 > ahcich0: Timeout on slot 14 > ahcich0: Timeout on slot 26 > ahcich0: Timeout on slot 6 > ahcich0: Timeout on slot 18 > ahcich0: Timeout on slot 30 Error recovery is still not finished. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A71D739.6040308>