Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:39:40 -0600
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Proposed #ifdef change to em
Message-ID:  <4728AFCC.7020706@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0710310935u6ed33491pcee4c6bd57d12d1a@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <2a41acea0710310935u6ed33491pcee4c6bd57d12d1a@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jack Vogel wrote:
> I have found that the FAST interrupt handling is  implicated
> in the watchdog resets that I have seen.
> 
> What I plan to do is revert to the way 6.2 had things, meaning
> that FAST interrupts will be available but defined off by default.
> 
> I wanted to know if anyone has an issue with this. And more
> importantly, I have personally not seen this problem on 7, but
> I could set up #ifdef's in that driver to be the same way.
> 
> What does everyone think?
> 
> Jack

Let's give it another couple of days to work out the real problem
before we throw in the towel.  Follow-ups in private...

Scott



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4728AFCC.7020706>