Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:59:22 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext Message-ID: <425ABAFA.2090607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1113241831.934.5.camel@cream.xbsd.org> References: <200504110804.j3B84fNs060515@repoman.freebsd.org> <425A32C8.30080.1710F6F5@localhost> <20050411152310.1fea4df6@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <1113241831.934.5.camel@cream.xbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Florent Thoumie wrote: > Le Monday 11 April 2005 à 15:23 +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu a écrit : > >>On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400 >>"Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> wrote: >> >> >>>On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote: >>> >>> >>>>obrien 2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC >>>> >>>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>>FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit: >> >> [ ... ] >> >>Next time I won't bother to make a list then :) >> >>flz has fixed a few, but pav suggest that the obrien might want to >>back-out the commit so he won't fix more of them until obrien decides. > > > Well, actually I'm going to fix all of these. > > He raised an interesting issue, fixing is better than backout > the commit. The number of broken ports isn't so high. > > /me raises mutex. I'd recommend fixing the ports. If obrien does decide to back out his commit, the number of fixed ports is small compared to the number of changed ports. There is probably also a significant amount of time before the backout will take place. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?425ABAFA.2090607>