Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/10642: exports(5) mentions KERBNFS but that's not in LINT Message-ID: <200008110830.BAA34197@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/10642; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Johan Karlsson <k@numeri.campus.luth.se> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, seggers@semyam.dinoco.de, dfr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/10642: exports(5) mentions KERBNFS but that's not in LINT Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:25:54 +0100 (BST) On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Johan Karlsson wrote: > At Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:24:57 BST, Doug Rabson wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Johan Karlsson wrote: > > > ==== src/sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c === > > > 1297: #ifdef NFSKERB > > > 1298: XXX > > > 1299: #endif > > > > > > Using this option would make the kernel not compile. > > > > > > If not I think it should be removed along with the reference > > > in exports(5). > > > > That is a marker to point out code which was removed to allow the code in > > question to be exported. It shouldn't be removed (unless all of the > > NFSKERB code is being removed) since it needs to be replaced with an > > appropriate call to an encryption routine. > > > > Ok, thanks for the explanation. > > What do you think about removing the reference in exports(5) or at least > adding something like > > "Using this option will make the kernel not compile, if one do not also > take care of adding calls to the appropriate kerberos encryption routins > in the NFS source." That sounds about right. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 20 8348 3944 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008110830.BAA34197>