Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:15:13 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Allen <slackwarewolf@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Unix Haters Handbook Message-ID: <867j3z3om6.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060601144317.47402556@hydrocodone.org> (slackwarewolf@comcast.net's message of "Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:43:17 -0400") References: <447E9540.2020003@io.dk> <200606011357.11990.aren.tyr@gawab.com> <447F0062.8060302@daleco.biz> <20060601144317.47402556@hydrocodone.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Allen <slackwarewolf@comcast.net> writes: > Technically FreeBSD has more right than SCO UNIX to be called UNIX No. Unlike FreeBSD, SCO UnixWare is a direct descendent of the original AT&T Unix. > Legally who cares laws and computer science have really not ever > mixed. That is a scary attitude which no-one in the open source community can afford to entertain. > I've seen the web site and read it before. to me it looked like a > windows guy who was paid to write down everything he was thinking > about Windows and change the names. Actually, the main author of the UNIX Hater's Handbook is a well- regarded Unix and computer security expert who has written numerous books on the subject. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867j3z3om6.fsf>