Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:56:41 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r40194 - projects/entities/share/xml Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=Mdui=%2B4svcERq-rkYHFqnu=0U1rezcx2DrLN4SpaG9w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201211301153.qAUBrqdA076984@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201211301153.qAUBrqdA076984@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 November 2012 06:53, Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: rene > Date: Fri Nov 30 11:53:51 2012 > New Revision: 40194 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/40194 > > Log: > - Merge content from developers.ent, notably these hat definitions: > - bugmeister, core, doceng, donations, portmgr, re, so > - Add entities for the following persons, gathered from the tree: > arundel, babb, bhaga, deb, ds, jkb, kuku, matt, tweten, wolf (name and email) > mkm, joe.halpin, pavalos, jwojdacki (name only) > > To avoid conflicts between &a.committer; from this file (with email address) > and &a.committer; from developers.ent, restructure the definitions: > - &a.committer; is now defined as the committers' name only > - &a.committer.email; is defined as the committers' name and email address Maybe it makes sense to do &a.committer.name; - just the name &a.committer.email; - just the email &a.committer &a.committer.name; &a.committer.email; or is there never a reason to use just the email address? -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=Mdui=%2B4svcERq-rkYHFqnu=0U1rezcx2DrLN4SpaG9w>