Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:15:44 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Ken Smith <kensmith@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: svn commit: r197313 - head/release Message-ID: <1253286944.18414.7.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090918150730.GA18347@FreeBSD.org> References: <200909181453.n8IEr1xJ093865@svn.freebsd.org> <20090918150730.GA18347@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:07 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> I've always been wondering how could docs be more important than livefs?
> I'd rather have -docs iso (which I won't ever download anyways) than
> -livefs one (which is needed far more often, e.g. to fix botched or
> corrupted installation) in addition to disc1.
[ Sorry, a bit distracted testing RC1 stuff right now so I forgot to add
to the first reply ... ]
I also tested dropping SEPARATE_LIVEFS from both amd64 and i386 earlier
in the release cycle just to see if that was even an option and it was
not. Without SEPARATE_LIVEFS the disc1 iso image overflowed our target
size even with no packages on it.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkqzpCAACgkQ/G14VSmup/ZlLQCeNIlTqkEe/cgJbEX8oeXdsaff
PAAAoIXMSTqJx0+dtctvbEXzu4CPhwk+
=FLpC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1253286944.18414.7.camel>