Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:47:11 -0500 From: Lewis Donzis <lew@perftech.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Bug 221385] [Regression] v6 mapped v4 addresses not working in 11.1 Message-ID: <DFF7B75E-F590-4E15-9B6A-8E9B3BECD7FC@perftech.com> In-Reply-To: <bug-221385-2472-XvbDNlHGhJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-221385-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-221385-2472-XvbDNlHGhJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello. This particular bug is a real problem in our embedded system, and = we=E2=80=99re trying to decide whether to go back to 11.0 or wait for a = patch for 11.1. We downloaded just the one file containing the fix, but it wouldn=E2=80=99= t compile, so we downloaded -CURRENT and verified that it works fine. = But it=E2=80=99s unclear to me whether the code in -CURRENT is slated = for an 11.1 patch, or if it won=E2=80=99t show up until 11.2 or even = 12.0. I see the "mfc-stable11 = <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221385#h5>=E2=80=9D = flag on the bug set to a value of =E2=80=9C?=E2=80=9D. Is that = significant? Perhaps someone can help us understand how to determine when and in = which version a fix will show up. Thanks, lew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DFF7B75E-F590-4E15-9B6A-8E9B3BECD7FC>