Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:12:06 -0500
From:      "Michael S. O'Donnell" <mso@bus.net>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        Timo Rossi <trossi@co.jyu.fi>, small@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: New approach to picobsd
Message-ID:  <388E0396.9EA998A1@bus.net>
References:  <3888D5CF.329989@achtung.com> <20000122145538.A390@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> <20000124122024.A4574@horus.co.jyu.fi> <20000125103358.U2643@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

although i'm a beginner to both picoBSD and FreeBSD, i will gladly
volunteer to assist in this effort in any way.  embedded systems
application is precisely the reason why i joined this group.

my background is manufacturing engineering, i have a BSEE where i
specialized in computer engineering.  my real skill is executing
mathematics in assembly language (now a dead skill).  i'm working
hard to gain stronger C skills and to better understand OSs.
meanwhile, i'm sure i could at least help in documentation.

as soon as i get ppp up, you won't have to deal with this netscape
generated mail from me anymore.  thanks for your patience.

Michael S. O'Donnell
mso@bus.net
V 203.334.5885
F 203.334.5453

> > What about embedded systems with small amounts of flash memory with
> > hard disk emulation (for example an IDE-flashdisk with a few
> > megabytes capacity)?
> 
> This is in fact an area that I might be investigating in the near
> future.  I think we need to look at a different approach for embedded
> systems.  On general-purpose systems, we aim for easy continuous
> change.  In order to do this, we have separate executables with
> dynamic linking to a large number of files.  These are all inefficient
> in storage utilization, so PicoBSD has no libraries and crunched
> executables.  I think the latter approach is also correct for flash
> memory systems.
> 
> Unfortunately, the current PicoBSD system is oriented towards
> floppies.  This has the great disadvantage, at least in the current
> implementation, that each crunched executable repeats the library
> contents.  For a flash memory system it would make more sense to have
> a single executable, which might be larger than a single floppy.
> 
> Greg
> --
> Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
> See complete headers for address and phone numbers
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?388E0396.9EA998A1>