Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 23:41:37 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@efn.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AW: BSD video capture emulation question Message-ID: <20030714064137.GT35337@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307132327420.87910-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <C48210CFAE2943478BB0ADA41A9FA27304B1BF@cspop.cs-nt-domaene.de> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307132327420.87910-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote this message on Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 23:29 -0700:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Cornelius, Peter wrote:
>
> > > > sounds like netgraph .. (runs for cover)
> >
> > hey. I was going to say just that.
>
> There is no reason why video streams should not be encoded as a stream
> of mbufs in which case netgraph could very well doexactly what
> is required :-)
If the mbuf code seperated it out, this MIGHT be a possibility, I'm
pretty sure we don't want to run into some of the problem with resource
contention on mbufs.. Also, the buffer space may need more fine
management... The idea of a sink sending a packet that a source fills
also is kinda wierd (necessary for some dma operations)..
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030714064137.GT35337>