Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:40:48 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: mdf@freebsd.org Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r212964 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <4C98D200.4040909@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C98CEE7.6060802@freebsd.org> References: <201009211507.o8LF7iVv097676@svn.freebsd.org> <AANLkTi=CTr%2BZDs3znsF-SXDp__xxbetjnhSBxiDhfFYy@mail.gmail.com> <4C98CEE7.6060802@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 21/09/2010 18:27 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 21/09/2010 18:17 mdf@FreeBSD.org said the following: >> >> I'd recommend using stack_print_ddb(), as that avoids any locking >> which may hang depending on how the kernel panic'd. > > It seems that stack_print_ddb() depends on DDB? But the point about locking is very good. How do you suggest we can deal with it? A dirty hack would be to check panicstr in linker_search_symbol_name and avoid locking, but I don't like that at all. Perhaps, some code in subr_stack.c could be taken outside DDB ifdef? Thank you! -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C98D200.4040909>