Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:36:28 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org, Dmitry Salychev <dsl@mcusim.org>
Subject:   Re: git: 07c64d74917e - main - acpica: Import ACPICA 20230628
Message-ID:  <737703f2-26a6-4a84-a64b-3fa55cad721c@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31/01/2024 19:40, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <04c4a0e1-aa79-4d25-a1f7-2196cfa65578@FreeBSD.org>, Jung-uk Kim
> writ
> es:
>> On 24. 1. 31., Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Either this one or the previous import is breaking arm64 build
>>>
>>> --- acpi_iort.o ---
>>> /home/bapt/worktrees/main/sys/arm64/acpica/acpi_iort.c:103:4: error: field
>>> 'data' with variable sized type 'union (unnamed union at
>>> /home/bapt/worktrees/main/sys/arm64/acpica/acpi_iort.c:98:2
>>> )' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension
>>> [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
>>>     103 |         } data;
>>>           |           ^
>>
>> Sorry for the breakage.  I will fix it soon.
>>
>> BTW, this code was added by this:
>>
>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31267
>>
>> It seems struct iort_named_component was a hack, which duplicated
>> ACPI_IORT_NAMED_COMPONENT but with a fixed length field DeviceName[32].
>> Is it really necessary?
> 
> Though they incorporated the WOL patch I've been using, they've broken
> poweroff.

The poweroff issue could be because of 9cdf326b4f

-- 
Andriy Gapon




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?737703f2-26a6-4a84-a64b-3fa55cad721c>