Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:55:36 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@incunabulum.net> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multicast problems [PATCH] Message-ID: <467907A8.8090706@incunabulum.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706191823040.1099@sea.ntplx.net> References: <E1I0E3b-0000kk-Ky@clue.co.za> <46765CB9.9020105@incunabulum.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706180833080.23884@sea.ntplx.net> <4676C30E.7040300@incunabulum.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706181344060.24865@sea.ntplx.net> <4676C952.5000607@incunabulum.net> <4676D168.3050502@incunabulum.net> <4678529A.3080308@incunabulum.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706191823040.1099@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote: > My system's not up to date enough to test this. I do have a > test program, that if runs, should be good enough. Thanks for doing this. I don't have free time to run further tests at the moment so am relying on help from folks who have had problems. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/test_net.c It looks like the multicast tests in this file are covered more or less by the existing regression test; it just needs to be run without a default route. > I think we would be more portable if we defined socklen_t to be > int32_t. This is a completely separate issue. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?467907A8.8090706>