Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:41:14 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>, Ben Woods <woodsb02@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r356758 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts Message-ID: <CAPyFy2DEC=jhQdxOLjUGs9nr%2B2n733XJfWKjTKYbAY7eubRkRQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <aea3e071-61bd-399d-1d1f-cce4125b2480@grosbein.net> References: <202001150747.00F7lqiG071097@repo.freebsd.org> <CAPjTQNHa9Um%2B0S8zMD3eeop3YSdVti0o=DSv5%2BB=455wcrq3VA@mail.gmail.com> <ed0b16af-01c8-62fe-918a-3f1f9f9dcbd8@freebsd.org> <CANCZdfpOw54MQsW4aohLn3ufgEqK8beTe_EdjYktViFubPPyzg@mail.gmail.com> <aea3e071-61bd-399d-1d1f-cce4125b2480@grosbein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 16:10, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> wrote: > > There are multiple scenarios there ZFS may be sub-optimal at least: small i386 virtual guests > or 32-bit only hardware like AMD Geode, or big amd64 SSD-only systems with bhyve and multiple guests > that need lots of memory and should not fight with ZFS for RAM etc. That may well be the case, but our defaults should represent the configuration that's desirable to the largest set of users, and IMO that's ZFS in most cases today. It might be that we should default to UFS on i386 and ZFS on amd64?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DEC=jhQdxOLjUGs9nr%2B2n733XJfWKjTKYbAY7eubRkRQ>