Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 19:14:25 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Matt Thyer <matt.thyer@gmail.com> Cc: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, "Thomas K." <fwd@gothschlampen.com>, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Memstick image differences between 8.x and 9.x Message-ID: <CAJ-VmompX_JwOs-pmp0J-2VRcxkxnBqVwr%2B8eLGcHE29D6nNoA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACM2%2B-5piHBKd5Rd-%2Bfxb-Fhntvo%2B9U%2B0-apFaD=dCv=VCYZ%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111008155252.GA24223.edited@vs2.gothschlampen.com> <CAGH67wTeHVfb01Bc51%2Bd=XCct7cUBfobcg5zWM-Rn%2B3bdM43cg@mail.gmail.com> <4E90B4B1.7000009@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110081533330.9628@wonkity.com> <4E90C801.4060108@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110081616340.9628@wonkity.com> <CACM2%2B-7QLk6OSiSN-1MSpQjdbFy_HFpaW_zv-4enqvPHRF1=%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <4E90EBF5.4090101@freebsd.org> <CACM2%2B-7hCYydByTCYANCJ_myLLmq3UOZPmsKKwko4o_6BvN1Fg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110081926280.10288@wonkity.com> <20111009025047.GB13517@vs2.gothschlampen.com> <CACM2%2B-5piHBKd5Rd-%2Bfxb-Fhntvo%2B9U%2B0-apFaD=dCv=VCYZ%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 October 2011 19:10, Matt Thyer <matt.thyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Failure to boot the FreeBSD 9.0-BETA{2|3} memstick images does not indicate
> a problem with a PCs BIOS/UEFI as these images are not properly formatted.
Accepted.
> If we were able to come up with examples of BIOS/UEFI that cannot boot from
> GPT partitioned volumes there would not be a problem as long as bsdinstall
> still supports partitioning volumes with MSDOS/MBR partitioning schemes.
>
> The big problem is being able to launch the installation process to start
> with which is yet another reason to have the memstick image non-GPT even if
> you could work out a script/kludge etc to be able to write a properly
> formatted GPT memstick.
>
> The solution to this issue is obvious.
Yes, it's "the current solution has a lot of unknown-how broken stuff
about it, let's revert it for 9.0 and then use the 10.0 release cycle
to do further research and testing."
:-)
adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmompX_JwOs-pmp0J-2VRcxkxnBqVwr%2B8eLGcHE29D6nNoA>