Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 19:38:14 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org> Subject: vfs_syscalls / fhstatfs / suser() Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0406061932520.62813@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Hi,
if I am not wrong the part removed by the atatched diff is not
needed because at the very beginning of the function there is a
error = suser(td);
if (error)
return (error);
so a second check should never become true again (if threads cannot be
move in and out of jails).
please correct me if I am wrong.
--- ./vfs_syscalls.c.orig Sun Jun 6 19:32:23 2004
+++ ./vfs_syscalls.c Sun Jun 6 19:33:12 2004
@@ -4128,11 +4128,6 @@ fhstatfs(td, uap)
sp->f_flags = mp->mnt_flag & MNT_VISFLAGMASK;
if ((error = VFS_STATFS(mp, sp, td)) != 0)
return (error);
- if (suser(td)) {
- bcopy(sp, &sb, sizeof(sb));
- sb.f_fsid.val[0] = sb.f_fsid.val[1] = 0;
- sp = &sb;
- }
return (copyout(sp, uap->buf, sizeof(*sp)));
}
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0406061932520.62813>