Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:36:48 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: rgrimes@freebsd.org, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r326809 - head/sys/dev/cardbus Message-ID: <5A318150.1000601@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <20171213182452.GA51526@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712131338.vBDDcHCM091865@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <5A3167E1.2000201@grosbein.net> <20171213180801.GA28514@FreeBSD.org> <5A316E7B.8030504@grosbein.net> <20171213182452.GA51526@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
14.12.2017 1:24, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> I'm a plain workstation user with X11+browser+torrent+quake2+you-name-it >>> apps, PAE-less, ZFS-less, and I don't want to get troubles due to r326758. >> >> Add kern.kstack_size=2 to /boot/loader.conf of your workstation now >> and you will notice no difference. > > FreeBSD is largely known for its sane defaults. Users should not touch > those config files, especially if things worked for years without any > /boot/loader.conf tweaking. If there are cases of kernel stack pressure > like your script had revealed, they should be fixed, and defaults stay > as they are now. I agree they should be fixed. I don't see they fixed soon (have not for years and there too many) and until then FreeBSD/i386 should panic due to incoming SCTP/IPV6 packet? > One does not tweak FreeBSD, it just works. (tm) Hmm. Do you really think so? I can assure you this is not true. There are numerous ways to take down untweaked FreeBSD system.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A318150.1000601>