Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 15:50:48 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 230.400 bps on serial port Message-ID: <199602232250.PAA24445@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199602232248.RAA05645@etinc.com> from "dennis" at Feb 23, 96 05:48:56 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> >The Intel UART parts, as much as Dennis loves them > >> > >> Where the heck did you get this from? I don't "love" or perfer any async > >> UART in > >> general! > > > >The "dream machine" discussion... > > No. You suggested using a Zilog SIO controller for synchronous communications. > I prefer dedicated HDLC protocol processors. The async part of it is > irrelevant to me. Do you mean the Zilog USART I suggested (the one Sun uses?) when you say "controller" here? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602232250.PAA24445>