Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:11:37 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_tc.c src/sys/sys timepps.h timetc.h Message-ID: <20020427121137.GB355@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <55629.1019857953@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200204262151.g3QLp8m26766@freefall.freebsd.org> <55629.1019857953@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-04-26 23:52, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >phk 2002/04/26 14:51:08 PDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> > sys/kern kern_tc.c
> > sys/sys timepps.h timetc.h
> > Log:
> > Now that the private parts of timecounters are no longer being fingered
> > by other bits of code, split struct timecounter into two.
>
> Please let me know if you see any changes in timekeeping behaviour
> as a result of this series of commits.
Given the fact that I'm running xntpd and it syncs the clock with a
known good source while online, is it possible that any problems might
get `hidden' by xntpd resetting the clock before it runs too different
from a correct value? That is, should I disable ntpd for a while?
Giorgos Keramidas FreeBSD Documentation Project
keramida@{freebsd.org,ceid.upatras.gr} http://www.FreeBSD.org/docproj/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020427121137.GB355>