Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:52:51 -0400 From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> To: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, Allen Landsidel <all@biosys.net> Cc: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ICQ with NAT problems Message-ID: <109960000.1003711970@vpn46.ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200110220047.f9M0lvw43677@grumpy.dyndns.org> References: <200110220047.f9M0lvw43677@grumpy.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, October 21, 2001 19:47:57 -0500, David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> wrote: +----- | What am I missing about the problem that the punch_fw option in natd is | not supposed to deal with? Is my understanding ICQ is only a particular | implementation of IRC? +--->8 Er, no; while it has a similar purpose, the protocol is completely different and I would be surprised if punch_fw worked with it. -- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][freebsd] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [JAPH][WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university [linux: proof of the million monkeys theory] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?109960000.1003711970>