Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:11:18 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: alex <alex@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD's UFS vs Ext4 Message-ID: <87hbpqz8wp.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20100208195807.GC8690@guilt.hydra> (Chad Perrin's message of "Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:58:07 -0700") References: <4B6ED119.2060308@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> <20100207172150.GA59080@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4B6F4631.6050501@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> <20100208150000.GA62607@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20100208195807.GC8690@guilt.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] There are no concrete plans to ditch gcc from the base system. The GPLv3 license of GCC and binutils does pose a few interesting problems. On the other hand, Clang is a nice project, whose license *is* compatible with a BSD-style license. Several FreeBSD developers have tried building the base system with it and are active at the development forums of Clang. So it's probably a safe assumption to make that Clang is not ready *yet*, but may be an interesting alternative to GCC in the near future. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktxiScACgkQ1g+UGjGGA7bCRACfeOM5YQxV8BuSz4WbZFULJVVU rx0An1kKhg93hqEH0fGK1Wv3PgfWGzZQ =SB3H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87hbpqz8wp.fsf>