Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:11:18 +0200 From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! Message-ID: <20060915191118.GA67073@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20060915153624.X1031@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net> <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <d6895b7d0609140844re8260fel953ddfeff0a9edf8@mail.gmail.com> <450AA29D.9000700@cs.tu-berlin.de> <200609151616.k8FGG23C065997@fire.jhs.private> <20060915175346.GF15445@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> <20060915153624.X1031@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:41:04PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > But, I'm just curious here ... for all of the talk going around about this > whole issue, how many ppl have truly ever been bitten by an unstable > -STABLE? And for those that have, how long did it take to get help from a > developer to get it fixed? After installing from 5.4-RELEASE, I've tracked stable, and I haven't had any real problems. This is a desktop system, not a server, BTW. Maybe it depends on the frequency of updating? I usually update after there has been a security advisory that affects me. Otherwise, if it ain't broken... > shouldn't be so much that he *broke* -STABLE (shit happens, do you want > your money back?), :-) Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFCvrWEnfvsMMhpyURAs6XAKCEiZ/TqtCnYrwzpJk8ZfOjX/rCbwCaA3By veupDsiuAXRSO8u5W0g//rU= =uO3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060915191118.GA67073>