Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:51:49 +0200 From: Milan Obuch <freebsd-current@dino.sk> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken? Message-ID: <20110624215149.5d71a0ff@atom.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20110616201833.GA27085@lo0.su> References: <20110616135017.3ec538dd@atom.dino.sk> <20110616125528.GA22627@lo0.su> <BANLkTinbxT_QOcmFDoEaRChD5SUgWE5yMw@mail.gmail.com> <20110616201833.GA27085@lo0.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:18:33 +0000 Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:09:05PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote: > > On 16 June 2011 16:55, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is > > >> specified for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue > > >> with build logs at my page, > > >> http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and > > >> http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. > > >> At this time, there is no /etc/make.conf nor /etc/src.conf. > > >> > > >> Any idea what's wrong with libegacy.a here? > > > > > > This option wasn't designed for build, only for install. =A0It's > > > like WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, which is documented to "not work for > > > build targets". > > > > >=20 > > Should this be simply ignored for build targets? >=20 > build targets utilize install targets internally, so this is > hardly doable. >=20 Could then this be documented in file /usr/src/tools/build/options/WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB, possibly the same way as in /usr/src/tools/build/options/WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN? It does not tell 'The option does not work for build targets' currently. Regards, Milan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110624215149.5d71a0ff>