Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:17:07 -0700 From: Janet Sullivan <ciscogeek@bgp4.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 Message-ID: <445BCEE3.6040607@bgp4.net> In-Reply-To: <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> References: <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com> <20060503110503.O58458@fledge.watson.org> <35c231bf0605031821s582b6d03j3ee9d434a596f62a@mail.gmail.com> <20060504021908.GA714@soaustin.net> <35c231bf0605032011s65fbb1aby742438465ee98ee7@mail.gmail.com> <20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org> <44598615.3040400@rogers.com> <20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org> <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Jakubik wrote: > arrive at the sacrifice of stability. I think FreeBSD should only be > released when known major bugs are worked out. A known broken release to > me and most new users is useless, lets not release simply for the sake > of numbering. For me, and many other quiet users, FreeBSD *IS* stable. I've been running 6.1 since the BETAs with no issues. No, I don't use quotas. I doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do. > I wish i was a good Unix C programmer myself, so i could contribute in a > more direct way (always hated those damn pointers), You could always hire or help sponsor a developer to fix your pet issues.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?445BCEE3.6040607>