Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 06:32:37 -0700 From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TCP_KEEPIDLE vs TCPTV_KEEP_IDLE Message-ID: <CACyXjPysbhQ5j%2B=PXC800iG2n4dkfvXPqj%2BFaTGUdRjesxiKLQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130506132821.GA15182@glebius.int.ru> References: <CACyXjPzfw3SAGXa0u6xBQgn79VyGEq7wj9V4GgkRnCazD6-PmA@mail.gmail.com> <20130506082235.GV15182@FreeBSD.org> <CACyXjPzG7dQ4_6J9sziNYY3OFGNwvncobjktV6=c9%2BkfBctAsA@mail.gmail.com> <20130506132332.GZ15182@glebius.int.ru> <CACyXjPxAeS0S54FYyibdNoXsGtHafCk1PU2-ha4s2cMf3NkWjQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130506132821.GA15182@glebius.int.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 06:26:14AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote: > R> Thank you for that answer. I don't have the option to install FreeBSD > R> 9.1. Maybe we will move to 9.1 in the future. > R> > R> However, I now understand the issues better. Of course that does > R> complicate my proposal on Samba technical, just a little. > > I don't understand the proposal. Samba correctly compiles with support > for the discussed socket options on those operating systems that support > them. No "fixes" to Samba are required, everything works correctly. Perhaps there are others out there like us who have to stick with earlier versions of FreeBSD where the symbols Samba currently uses are not supported. In the spirit of few or no surprises for users, a small amount of #ifdef stuff will work. Of course, my fellow Samba team members might decide that it is not worth i= t. --=20 Regards, Richard Sharpe (=A6=F3=A5H=B8=D1=BC~=A1H=B0=DF=A6=B3=A7=F9=B1d=A1C--=B1=E4=BE=DE)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACyXjPysbhQ5j%2B=PXC800iG2n4dkfvXPqj%2BFaTGUdRjesxiKLQ>