Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:41:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: dec2@inetu.net Cc: dev@samurai.com, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Actual bandwidth used vs. statistics reports - customer explaination Message-ID: <200204040942.g349fvWU000646@Magelan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10204031233500.4892-100000@norad.inetu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 Apr, dec2 wrote:
> It could be. I'm guessing its a combination of excluded URL's (Webalizer
> does by default). It also excludes Media files (duh!) and protocol
> headers, which take at least 15% off the top - maybe more depending.
>
> We have updated webalizer config files to include audio and media files..
>
> It could also be e-mail and FTP, but Webalizer is only accounting for 50%
> of the bandwidth being measured at the IP-level, so the customer is asking
> for more justification. :-)
What about producing reports for FTP and mail too and let them add the
numbers on their own (ports/textproc/modlogan comes to my mind...)?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Weird enough for government work.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204040942.g349fvWU000646>