Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:12:32 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: soc-status@freebsd.org Cc: =?UTF-8?B?RWR3YXJkIFRvbWFzeiBOYXBpZXJhxYJh?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Collective resource limits status report #7 Message-ID: <4C433600.2090506@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C30B90F.9040703@FreeBSD.org> References: <4C1BCB96.4040608@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTikwUYWCIvlDQ60L4L8gMcEeDFIV6850csEwuH8E@mail.gmail.com> <4C21CAF0.2040607@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTikLoskpABjaUlufnBGOBeU-Z62CiuQfH5sDyY1Z@mail.gmail.com> <4C230A0B.3080700@FreeBSD.org> <4C2761B8.9030800@FreeBSD.org> <4C30B90F.9040703@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Since last report, I temporarily changed to 32-bit jid_t to solve that problem I described. It worked but then I had similar issues with a single int variable... I still don't know the actual reason but I could solve it by adding syscalls to compat32 and declaring jid_t in the proper place. So the basic syscalls work now, the process number limit also seems to work, so now I can actually test the existing stuff. I've added some test cases to the tester app. I've found a bug in killjob, somehow it results in a page fault. Plan for next week is to track this down and fix, and then start adding support for more limits. Latest sources in //depot/projects/soc2010/gabor_jobs/irix_jobs/, full patch here: http://kovesdan.org/patches/jobs-20100718.diff Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C433600.2090506>