Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:32:31 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 Message-ID: <CAPyFy2Cxg1rLHUZeX7dUiBzXeRMSqy8aBPuwz0AMS8GX8_RPvQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20211028152642.ejvwewkztewotln4@mutt-hbsd> References: <CAPyFy2CJKxMQQKwD3N=MTe-P4KodN77e3YCEh4z0Ssf9sXWEcQ@mail.gmail.com> <20211028152642.ejvwewkztewotln4@mutt-hbsd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 11:26, Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> wrote: > > It seems that smbfs might be used with some level of frequency in > virtualized environments. I wonder if providing a 9pfs client would be > a good step in helping deprecate smbfs. Indeed, that addresses one of the primary reasons it is still being used, including by CHERI. Their plan to migrate away from smbfs is based on moving to 9pfs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2Cxg1rLHUZeX7dUiBzXeRMSqy8aBPuwz0AMS8GX8_RPvQ>