Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:35:36 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>, marino@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r365208 - head/www/squidguard Message-ID: <53F1BAD8.50705@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <53F1B560.4090003@FreeBSD.org> References: <201408171718.s7HHIMRh017558@svn.freebsd.org> <9eead94ee58708b60a67fa030af7e2fc@secure.marino.st> <53F127D0.3060500@marino.st> <53F1B560.4090003@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/18/2014 10:12, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 08/18/14 00:08, John Marino wrote: >> Hi Guido, Squid 3.2 will be removed the same day as Squid 2.7. It's EOL >> too. >> Oh, and if that's not enough, squidguard is at risk of being removed >> anyway because databases/db4, of which it depends, is unstaged and >> getting removed. see: >> >> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/misc/screwed.maintained.txt > > Oops, sorry, I did not notice this much. > > I'd really like to see this solved, unluckily I'm unable to do this > right away, since I'm away from home. > > The squid port is a useful one for many people I think. > > So regarding squidguard is it required from me to put back the > deprecated line o can it stay as it is for a week or so until I'm able > to look at it properly? No, it's not required. It's for users and you'll have it fixed before squid32 is removed. Regards, John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53F1BAD8.50705>