Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:17:11 +0200 From: Michael Reifenberger <mike@reifenberger.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/jexec jexec.8 jexec.c Message-ID: <20080530091711.GA5794@gw.reifenberger.com> In-Reply-To: <20080530091426.K34417@fledge.watson.org> References: <200805291700.m4TH02it075562@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080529180430.R3678@fledge.watson.org> <20080530075750.GA5189@gw.reifenberger.com> <20080530091426.K34417@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:24:55AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > ... > > Here's the specific concern I have: an administrator starts a jail with a > name/IP number, and various processes run, creating TCP connections. The > administrator shuts down the jail to change global configuration for the > jail, but some TCP connections remain in TIME_WAIT (etc) as they spin down. > The administrator then restarts the jail. For some number of minutes after > starting the new jail, jexec will fail with the new jail, as the > specification by IP or hostname will be ambiguous. > Really? What would jls show during the 2 minutes period? If your statement is true then jls is broken also because the displayed information cant be trusted. -- Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.Reifenberger.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080530091711.GA5794>