Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:25:19 +0000 From: Robert Crowston <crowston@protonmail.com> To: tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tmp and tmpfs Message-ID: <hUVMLjJ0YusVdfQ01Rcvi_o_h6EGt3TIP57pfF5nS2qkobEr7K9LZmhVz-Vq6BYx5pjtpkjgJBTRBPjdY0S-tA6ji48DdNY7OWOco51WOqo=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <X7KYfEsH0WU6hBxc@rpi4.local>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
It’ll be significantly faster in memory, it depends if you want to spare the ram. How many temporary files do you have? On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 15:19, tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> wrote: > Him > > context is rpi4 running very recent -current. > > Which is faster/better? /tmp mounted as tmpfs as per default on rpi2/3/4, or /tmp as zfs on a usb3-connected spinning rust hd? I understand that if tmpfs fills up, it'll use swap. Faster/slower than /tmp on zfs? > > Spinning rust is also where the swap partition lives. > > thanks > -- > J.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hUVMLjJ0YusVdfQ01Rcvi_o_h6EGt3TIP57pfF5nS2qkobEr7K9LZmhVz-Vq6BYx5pjtpkjgJBTRBPjdY0S-tA6ji48DdNY7OWOco51WOqo=>