Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:27:56 +0100
From:      Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
To:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: linuxolator broken on alpha/amd64 (was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/linux32 linux32_sysvec.c syscalls.master src/sys/compat/linux linux_file.c linux_getcwd.c linux_ioctl.c linux_ipc.c linux_mib.c linux_misc.c linux_signal.c linux_socket.c linux_stats.c linux_sysctl.c linux_uid16.c)
Message-ID:  <20060320082756.GA21146@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20060319172522.6d93c008@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
References:  <200603191110.k2JBAYxC085982@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060319113039.GD89287@ip.net.ua> <20060319172522.6d93c008@Magellan.Leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 05:25:22PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Am Sun, 19 Mar 2006 13:30:39 +0200
> schrieb Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>:
> 
> [redirecting to current@]
> 
> > Linuxulator is still broken after my preliminary fix referenced
> > below, on both amd64 and alpha.  On amd64, it now stops here:
> 
> > : /usr/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_stats.c:233: warning: "struct linux_lstat_args" declared inside parameter list
> 
> > On alpha/LINT, it will break similarly, because you didn't provide
> > support for them.
> 
> Does anyone know the linux syscall numbers on alpha/amd64 for lstat?
> They need to be added to the corresponding syscalls.master.

in my patch I had lstat as syscall 84, you changed that to stat. I had reports
it worked on amd64.. why did you change it?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060320082756.GA21146>